Advertisement

Water Bills Frozen for Next Five Years

Reuters Created: Nov 25, 2009 Last Updated: Nov 25, 2009
Print | E-mail to a friend | Give feedback
Related articles: United Kingdom > National
Water Bills Frozen for Next Five Years
Water bills were to rise at 3 percent more than inflation each year from 2010 to 2015 in London. Now Ofwat, the water pricing regulator, have pleased consumers and relieved firms by freezing national prices for five years. Water companies were expecting to have to cut bills by 4 percent. (Cate Gillon/Getty Images)
LONDON—Water companies were ordered on Thursday to freeze water bills over the next five years, cheering consumers and giving some relief to firms who were asked in a draft ruling to cut the bills by 4 percent.

The regulator Ofwat sets the amount water companies operating in England and Wales can charge their customers every five years, and rules how much the companies are allowed to make from their investments.

By 2015 bills will fall by 3 pounds to 340 pounds on average, it said.

While not as much as in the draft ruling, this is between 7 and 10 percent lower than the amount that companies in the sector -- which include Pennon, Northumbrian Water, Severn Trent and United Utilities -- had originally wanted to charge.

Ofwat said this championed consumer interests, clamping down on water firms, many of which have earned good profits on the back of increasing bills for customers.

The regulator also said it has allowed companies to make the biggest ever investment in the water infrastructure in England and Wales, totalling 22 billion pounds over the five-year period.

"People can shop around for the best deal on many things, but not water. Our job is to do this for them," Ofwat Chief Executive Regina Finn said in a statement.

However, Ofwat has kept the return that water companies are allowed to make on their capital -- critical for maintaining dividends -- at 4.5 percent on a post-tax basis, which was at the low end of analyst expectations when it was first announced in the draft determination in July.

Water companies are traditionally seen as reliable dividend stocks for investors, but many analysts believed the ruling could force some to cut payouts in the future, or even raise cash from the market, if they decide they are getting inadequate returns from spending plans.

 



 
Advertisement